3 ms·
I think having constant surveillance can have a negative impact on work life. I know that when discussions moved to Slack at my work place there was a very diff
by harrisi 9y ago
I think having constant surveillance can have a negative impact on work life. I know that when discussions moved to Slack at my work place there was a very different way to communicate due to us knowing our conversations may be read. Not that there were any instances of harassment, but sometimes it can be relieving to tell a coworker that your boss is a dick. It can help get feelings out before they build up.
I do see some value in surveillance, such as the GP's instance (whether or not it's true -- it's a reasonably plausible story). I, however, don't think that constant surveillance that upper management has free reign over is good. I did have an idea about this. Is there a way to have a file (such as video/audio) encrypted in such a way that it can only be decrypted with multiple keys? In GP's case, GP and the employee that made the accusation? That way you can still feel safe(-ish) that your small slacking off won't risk your job, while allowing for evidence in serious situations such as GP's.
- seanp2k2 9y agoThere's also a difference between saving different levels of stuff within Slack. It can go all the way to saving everything including private channels and direct messages: https://get.slack.help/hc/en-us/articles/220548947-Apply-for-Compliance-Exports https://get.slack.help/hc/en-us/articles/220548947-Apply-for... or just for channels: https://get.slack.help/hc/en-us/articles/203457187-Custom-message-and-file-retention https://get.slack.help/hc/en-us/articles/203457187-Custom-me... Make sure you know who's reading your DMs if you use Slack to e.g. complain about your manager. As someone able to make these decisions, make sure you know who has access and audit that. The story of the manager firing someone for performance reasons when the real reason is that they overheard something they didn't like is as old as the hills.