14 ms·
> That tells me that the entire concept of peer review is not immune to degenerating. And if it can happen in one field, it can happen in another, especially on
by Oletros 9y ago
> That tells me that the entire concept of peer review is not immune to degenerating. And if it can happen in one field, it can happen in another, especially one that's harshly politicized (which psychology isn't, at least not anywhere near the same insane degree).
Politization occurs almost only in the US.
Are you accusing the scientists of being politized?
Do you have any argument for your claims of not reprodicibility in climate science?
Do you have any argument for doubting the data that has been used for more than 40 years?
Do you have any argument apart of your political views?
- Karunamon 9y agoAre you saying scientists (or rather, the institutions that fund their research and publish their data) are immune to politicization? Are you saying that climatology is immune to bunk being published despite peer review? Your post is a lot of whataboutism that doesn't answer the questions posed.