I don't disagree, but that's not the point. There are two things being debated. One is that the errors by the officials are unaccaptable and they must introduce

I don't disagree, but that's not the point. There are two things being debated. One is that the errors by the officials are unaccaptable and they must introduce technology to reduce them. I'm not discussing that. The other is that somehow the game is flawed because there aren't enough goals, and hence chance plays a large part. I'm arguing that such claims are misguided. In some sense the two are not entirely orthogonal because a single error by an official that leads to, or prevents, a goal has an enormous effect on the game. Nevertheless, there are two issues, I'm talking about one, and you are talking about the other. I'm discussing the point raised in the original submission. You aren't, except insofar as they are not entirely unrelated, as I remark above.