I recall that NIDA had some rather nasty quality control issues (you'd think you'd be able to do better with a budget of 69 million dollars)[0]. To be honest, I

I recall that NIDA had some rather nasty quality control issues (you'd think you'd be able to do better with a budget of 69 million dollars)[0]. To be honest, I could imagine at least some studies being rejected for lack of adequate supplies. Not much point in trying to do science if your samples are heavily contaminated. [0]: http://www.pbs.org/newshour/updates/scientists-say-governments-pot-farm-moldy-samples-no-guidelines/ http://www.pbs.org/newshour/updates/scientists-say-governmen...