3 ms·
I wasn't aware of that, thanks for the link! Looks like it's more advanced than what I'm doing at the moment... Thanks, Kyle
by kyleburton 16y ago
I wasn't aware of that, thanks for the link! Looks like it's more advanced than what I'm doing at the moment...
Thanks,
Kyle
- jamesjyu 16y agoYes, scanR may be more sophisticated in their image processing technology, but their system is just not as easy to use (the last time I checked it out). My suggestion to you is to keep running with your idea of making your service dead simple to use. I love the idea of just sending it to an email address -- reminds me of posterous, but for image processing.
- ydant 16y agoYes, like Posterous has shown, simple can win you converts even if it's lacking functionality.