3 ms·

How will a scientist reproduce a study when the original study is not public?

• yorwba 9y ago
  I thought the argument was that the research could not be reproduced because the studies were about one-time events that could not be repeated, not because they were simply not publicly available. If the latter case is true, then I support disallowing these studies for policy decisions, since how can you use something for support if others can't even look at it to verify that it says what you say it does?
  • thatcat 9y ago
    You cant look at it because "its not repeatable" and therefore not publically available so cannot be repeated indefinitely. Seems like a political levee to hold back the sea of environmental data.