3 ms·
It's worth noting this post caused a very intense twitter debate among the NLP and DL communities, especially after Yann Lecun replied to Yoav's comments. https
by slashcom 9y ago
It's worth noting this post caused a very intense twitter debate among the NLP and DL communities, especially after Yann Lecun replied to Yoav's comments. https://www.facebook.com/yann.lecun/posts/10154498539442143 https://www.facebook.com/yann.lecun/posts/10154498539442143
- sillysaurus3 9y agoWhat are some twitter links? I'd be interested to see the kind of nuanced conversations that twitter can spawn. Also looking to follow some NLP people.
- Mathnerd314 9y agoTwitter has a search box: https://twitter.com/search?f=tweets&vertical=default&q=An%20Adversarial%20Review%20of%20%E2%80%9CAdversarial%20Generation%20of%20Natural%20Language%E2%80%9D https://twitter.com/search?f=tweets&vertical=default&q=An%20... This newsletter looks interesting (mentioned on Twitter): http://digest.deeplearningweekly.com/issues/deep-learning-weekly-issue-44-ai-understanding-google-mobilenet-machine-intelligence-summits-sobolev-trainings-for-nns-flag-planting-and-overselling-results-61446 http://digest.deeplearningweekly.com/issues/deep-learning-we... This seems like the only real discussion from the search: https://twitter.com/kchonyc/status/873305485428088833 https://twitter.com/kchonyc/status/873305485428088833 I guess search is broken, the author's twitter feed has a bunch more discussion (https://twitter.com/yoavgo/with_replies https://twitter.com/yoavgo/with_replies): https://twitter.com/yoavgo/status/872831207163265024 https://twitter.com/yoavgo/status/872831207163265024 https://twitter.com/yoavgo/status/872968874521702400 https://twitter.com/yoavgo/status/872968874521702400 https://twitter.com/Smerity/status/872971766959718400 https://twitter.com/Smerity/status/872971766959718400 https://twitter.com/yoavgo/status/873489277157507072 https://twitter.com/yoavgo/status/873489277157507072 https://twitter.com/jacobandreas/status/873109327644573696 https://twitter.com/jacobandreas/status/873109327644573696 https://twitter.com/yoavgo/status/873175136056336386 https://twitter.com/yoavgo/status/873175136056336386 https://twitter.com/hugo_larochelle/status/873369688675430400 https://twitter.com/hugo_larochelle/status/87336968867543040... https://twitter.com/kchonyc/status/873306255204507648 https://twitter.com/kchonyc/status/873306255204507648 https://twitter.com/yoavgo/status/873786844315607040 https://twitter.com/yoavgo/status/873786844315607040 https://twitter.com/haldaume3/status/873565061754781697 https://twitter.com/haldaume3/status/873565061754781697
- sp332 9y agoNone of those tweets have the phrase you searched for, so why do you conclude that search is broken?
- Mathnerd314 9y agoSeveral of the tweets link to the post, and the title shows up in Twitter's preview box (although not in the tweet proper). If Twitter search "worked" it should have found those, via some magic string munging or whatever. My definition of "works" is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DWIM https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DWIM, others are free to disagree.