4 ms·
In this case it could simply be a sizable fraction of the value of the land. Apparently he values this strip of access at $30,000,000 so that's where the fine s
by Gargoyle 9y ago
In this case it could simply be a sizable fraction of the value of the land. Apparently he values this strip of access at $30,000,000 so that's where the fine should be based. Hey, it's his measure of the value.
- zdkl 9y ago"The court seeks fines on the order of 1/365th of the terrain's value per day of continued denied access and will repossess the land in 1 year and 1 day if this ruling is not complied with" Schadenfreude all around.
- seanp2k2 9y agoYeah, repossessing the land seems the right course of action here for continued and blatant disregard for the law for so long. Monetary fines will do nothing against him, so take away something he can't buy (the right to occupy property). From the sound of it, he seems to have a "come at me bro" attitude towards the government and law enforcement, so this too would likely get delayed and fought indefinitely in courts. At the end when he loses, he'd probably just sell it somehow (for a profit) and move to a different place, then do the same thing. A lot of money shouldn't mean a lot of potential to cause a lot of strife for a lot of people.