4 ms·
Sorry, that sucks. But introducing more sexism because you faced sexism isn't the answer. Also, there are lots of things you can do to make the world a better
by xxSparkleSxx 9y ago
Sorry, that sucks. But introducing more sexism because you faced sexism isn't the answer.
Also, there are lots of things you can do to make the world a better place on your way out. Please don't waste your life getting run over.
- Mz 9y agoI'm not talking about adding more sexism to the system. I am talking about remedying the problem for these women in preference to going on a headhunt for "guilty men." I don't know why in the hell you think that is me advocating more sexism. That is me saying that even if you hang all the guilty men, that still does NOT open doors for women. In fact, it closes them. And there is a part of me that suspects that is the entire point of going on a headhunt for guilty men instead of trying to open doors for women: It preserves the goddamn status quo. I don't know how to say it more clearly than that. And the fact that people are twisting my words in this way just makes me think this is truly fucking hopeless and there is no goddamn point at all in trying to do anything in this shithole of a world. It will never change.
- urahara 9y agoUnfortunately, there exists a point of view that giving women more power = more sexism as it reduces the power of men, actually. I agree with you that action and opening the doors for women is far more important than punishing 'guilty men', but I'm not sure if it is possible to have the first without the second. Maybe more 'guilty men' punished = less 'guilty men' keeping funding from women = more women funded.