>> If what is lawful differs from what is most conducive to human flourishing, it is the law that should be changed. If we're talking about laws being conduciv

>> If what is lawful differs from what is most conducive to human flourishing, it is the law that should be changed. If we're talking about laws being conducive to human flourishing, then the law is perfect as is, and in fact, should have even more teeth to make it easier to enforce. The current law is designed for the exact purpose of human flourishing. Specifically, the flourishing of ALL the citizens of California and visitors thereto. The law, as is, prioritizes the flourishing of millions of people over the flourishing of a very few extremely wealthy individuals. This is a textbook example of a good law.