4 ms·
I think the parent is saying something different: They were happy with GraphQL for their API, but weren't happy with the requirements the Relay client library i
by djmashko2 9y ago
I think the parent is saying something different: They were happy with GraphQL for their API, but weren't happy with the requirements the Relay client library imposed.
My interpretation is that they are now using a GraphQL API but fetching from it with regular HTTP fetches and managing data with Redux on the frontend.
- sAbakumoff 9y agoYes exactly, thanks for your help.
- lioeters 9y agoAha, thanks for the clarification. Upon reading the comment again, I see that it's Relay that didn't suit his use case, not GraphQL.