> CNN might be negative on trump, but the massive coverage they gave him, driven by a quest for ratings, made him more credible than the other republicans That

> CNN might be negative on trump, but the massive coverage they gave him, driven by a quest for ratings, made him more credible than the other republicans That's kinda my thinking. CNN went so far in backing one candidate and ignoring or negatively covering the others, that if I didn't know any better would have thought they colluded with Trump. That is, by their obvious bias and seeming obsession with Trump, reporting about how many scoops of ice creams he eats, the whole Russia this Russia that narrative, saying stupid stuff like "don't read these documents, it's illegal, come to us for interpretation" they pushed people away and are making Trump look credible.