> At no point. That's how science works. Those who are opposed will bring up the best arguments available, even if those arguments aren't new. They'll get eval

> At no point. That's how science works. Those who are opposed will bring up the best arguments available, even if those arguments aren't new. They'll get evaluated, rebuffed, accepted, etc. That's how it's supposed to work. No, this is not how Science works. Repeating ad nauseaum the same debunked arguments is not how science works. Or perhaps you think that is still valid to bring the Thomson atomic model today? Or the flogistum hypothesis? The only thing those are doing is mudding the waters to stop the actions, nothing more.