4 ms·
I think the most compelling products deliver utility. Even if targeting base desires is your product design strategy doesn't mean it needs to be in a template f
by anindha 9y ago
I think the most compelling products deliver utility. Even if targeting base desires is your product design strategy doesn't mean it needs to be in a template for future founders to follow.
Your argument is similar to the argument for having swimsuit models in tabloid newspapers. NYT is a better product.
- mhluongo 9y agoI'm not claiming he's right. I'm just responding that it's a useful idea, and that the language makes sense to reinforce the idea. Edit: aside, it's interesting (and frustrating) that comments on HN are often assumed to be arguments. Here for a discussion, not to defend a thesis.
- TeMPOraL 9y ago> I think the most compelling products deliver utility. > Your argument is similar to the argument for having swimsuit models in tabloid newspapers. NYT is a better product. The argument is right, because better (as in NYT vs. tabloids, or as in better in worse-is-better) products don't win on market. If you can target base desires, you'll beat products delivering utility.
- coldtea 9y ago>Your argument is similar to the argument for having swimsuit models in tabloid newspapers. NYT is a better product. Not if "sells more" is a measure of product betterness. (Besides swimsuit models never harmed anybody -- the NYT helped sell war with huge human toll with BS government-fed info).
- Alex3917 9y ago> Even if targeting base desires is your product design strategy doesn't mean it needs to be in a template for future founders to follow. Call me old school, but I still think that JWZ post "Groupware Bad" is one of the most important in the history of blogging.