3 ms·
I think the assumption is that these are possible reasons for failure after you discarded "not intelligent enough", which indeed could be a pretty valid reason.
by lkozma 16y ago
I think the assumption is that these are possible reasons for failure after you discarded "not intelligent enough", which indeed could be a pretty valid reason.
The article refers to the remaining branches, thus the title.
- petercooper 16y agoSo you could remove the first item and retitle it Why Motivated People Fail? Or the 17th and Why Patient People Fail. Hmm.. I could sell this idea to Mahalo ;-)
- Confusion 16y agoI agree: with this title, the author neatly sidesteps the problem of having to define 'intelligence' and ending up in an endless debate about whether his reasons indeed pertain to 'intelligence'. 'Not intelligent enough' can probably be dissected into another 20 points, each portraying a characteristic that is a necessary, but not a sufficient, part of 'intelligence'. You are both right :)