> The reasoning that they can pay means they should is almost defining corruption, and an easy way for a govt to get money. If the system is good enough for yo

> The reasoning that they can pay means they should is almost defining corruption, and an easy way for a govt to get money. If the system is good enough for you to make hundreds of billions of some years, yes, you should expend a lot to conform with society's needs. > You can't ignore the complex design off millions off people streaming millions of text inputs daily and checking it all 100%. You can't allow a company to have so much power over millions of people just because it is difficult to make it conform and keep working. Guess what, find a better solution. The world is not 1% better with all this live Facebook BS, I'd not give a care if it was all shutdown. It is not a free speech problem if they are exploiting it for their own benefit.