I'm not sure what you mean by "Solves Zooko's Triangle", as the Triangle is an assertion of a problem (trilemma) that can't be solved. If you mean "refutes", I

I'm not sure what you mean by "Solves Zooko's Triangle", as the Triangle is an assertion of a problem (trilemma) that can't be solved. If you mean "refutes", I disagree. Besides the problem with names, bitcoin is, of course, vulnerable on the security side---to 50% or more of computing power being used maliciously (or being fraudulently converted to hidden malicious use). While the distributed nature of bitcoin strongly mitigates this once the network is big enough, the point of Zooko's Triangle is that you have to accept no better than mitigation of risk on at least one leg, not its elimination. The possibility of Sybil attacks also point out issues associated with the anonymity of other network participants and the possibility of hidden collusion.