3 ms·
The author advocates "serverless" from the get-go because a "single server is not enough for anything non-trivial these days". I completely disagree. Servers a
by zip1234 9y ago
The author advocates "serverless" from the get-go because a "single server is not enough for anything non-trivial these days".
I completely disagree. Servers are beefier than ever and scaling up has never been cheaper.
Look at how StackOverflow operates:
https://nickcraver.com/blog/2016/02/17/stack-overflow-the-architecture-2016-edition/ https://nickcraver.com/blog/2016/02/17/stack-overflow-the-ar...
They have 4 SQL servers that handle 500 million queries per day. 125 million queries per server. There are a lot of apps that can get by with less than 125 million queries per day :)
- Spivak 9y agoHardware is cheap, expertise in deploying and maintaining it isn't.