5 ms·

And I'd assume the reason it's is banned in Ukraine is likely due to the persistant rumors that Kaspersky is tied to the Russian FSB. Anti-virus would be a bri

And I'd assume the reason it's is banned in Ukraine is likely due to the persistant rumors that Kaspersky is tied to the Russian FSB. Anti-virus would be a brilliant way to gain access to millions of machines, send back "sample" files via specific user targeted updates... If so (and again I'm starting this sentence with IF), being lenient on Kaspersky would have dual benefits of focusing the target Ukraine, provide a "cure" for any critical machines hit in Russia, and allow existing Kaspersky users to recover once the cure is known. The Interesting thing here is if this was a trial run, I don't think you get another one. If there is another bit of malware that treads lightly on Kaspersky machines, or "accidentally" fails to activate on them then the gig is up. Still speculation, but will be interesting to follow.

qb45 9y ago
Problem: user files are still being encrypted regardless of what happens to MBR so you end up doing MBR recovery only to boot a system without your data.
- Qerub 9y ago
  No, the Kaspersky check is done before encrypting any files. Source: https://blogs.technet.microsoft.com/mmpc/2017/06/29/windows-10-platform-resilience-against-the-petya-ransomware-attack/?platform=hootsuite https://blogs.technet.microsoft.com/mmpc/2017/06/29/windows-...
  - qb45 9y ago
    It seems checks are done early but MBR destruction only at the end: During malware initialization phase, this malware maintains a global variable that dictates its behavior. It alters its behavior based on the presence of processes related to certain antivirus applications running in the system. Specifically, it looks for names of processes belonging to Kaspersky Antivirus and Symantec Antivirus and alters its behavior if it finds them. Information controlling threats behavior is stored in a global variable (gConfig in the screenshots), which is then used to check during MBR modification. If Kaspersky Antivirus process is found in the system or if the MBR infection is unsuccessful, the malware then proceeds to destroy the first 10 sectors of the hard drive.

qb45 9y ago

Problem: user files are still being encrypted regardless of what happens to MBR so you end up doing MBR recovery only to boot a system without your data.

Qerub 9y ago
No, the Kaspersky check is done before encrypting any files. Source: https://blogs.technet.microsoft.com/mmpc/2017/06/29/windows-10-platform-resilience-against-the-petya-ransomware-attack/?platform=hootsuite https://blogs.technet.microsoft.com/mmpc/2017/06/29/windows-...
- qb45 9y ago
  It seems checks are done early but MBR destruction only at the end: During malware initialization phase, this malware maintains a global variable that dictates its behavior. It alters its behavior based on the presence of processes related to certain antivirus applications running in the system. Specifically, it looks for names of processes belonging to Kaspersky Antivirus and Symantec Antivirus and alters its behavior if it finds them. Information controlling threats behavior is stored in a global variable (gConfig in the screenshots), which is then used to check during MBR modification. If Kaspersky Antivirus process is found in the system or if the MBR infection is unsuccessful, the malware then proceeds to destroy the first 10 sectors of the hard drive.