Yeah well the hostile scrutiny isn't trying to bias towards a different scientific conclusion. They are trying to undermine the entire concept of science. The

Yeah well the hostile scrutiny isn't trying to bias towards a different scientific conclusion. They are trying to undermine the entire concept of science. They don't want there to be objective facts. What we're talking about isn't biased scrutiny, it's dishonest scrutiny. Anything that endangers short term gains on Wall Street is to be destroyed. There is no way that's compatible with such a complicated, subtle, and slow-moving field of study like climate science.