Critiquing a hypothesis is part of the scientific process, not "anti-science". "Critiquing" the same hypothesis by sea-lioning ("We're just asking some questio

Critiquing a hypothesis is part of the scientific process, not "anti-science". "Critiquing" the same hypothesis by sea-lioning ("We're just asking some questions," when the questions have been well answered a hundred times), over and over again for years on end, is very much "anti-science." It's the same minimally-within-the-rules strategy used by the Holocaust deniers, Gamergate shitlords, and the neo-Fascists. It's not debate in good faith, it's a strategy of attrition, an attempt to waste human resources.