As much as I dislike facebook. The reasoning that they can pay means they should is almost defining corruption, and an easy way for a govt to get money. The pr

As much as I dislike facebook. The reasoning that they can pay means they should is almost defining corruption, and an easy way for a govt to get money. The problem is not one of morals, as I doubt fb wants this type off content at all. I think it's possibly unreasonable. It's fb vs the world quite literally. It's the nature off it's design. What's next? Police gets fined if they can't catch a criminal within a week? What about a fireman getting fined if he can't put out a fire within 20 minutes. All these things share an uncontrollable and unpredictable situation. You can't ignore the complex design off millions off people streaming millions of text inputs daily and checking it all 100%. That's monkey reasoning, black and white thinking fallacies. Fb should give insight and show how they battle it, but imo it's childish to randomly give 24 hours. At least come with an argument or 'standard' if u will (ie. 1 content checker person per 1k posts or w/e).