4 ms·
Not a parent myself. (But I had a couple.) Whenever the subject of parenting comes up, I like to throw this cherrybomb into the discussion: Judith Rich Harris
by klenwell 9y ago
Not a parent myself. (But I had a couple.)
Whenever the subject of parenting comes up, I like to throw this cherrybomb into the discussion: Judith Rich Harris
"Judith Rich Harris (born February 10, 1938) is a psychology researcher and the author of The Nurture Assumption, a book criticizing the belief that parents are the most important factor in child development, and presenting evidence which contradicts that belief."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judith_Rich_Harris http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judith_Rich_Harris
To see how this idea may play out in practice, consider the fierce debate over tiger mothering from a few years back.
Here's the HN discussion:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2090678 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2090678
My take on Tiger Mom Amy Chua's methodology (at the top of that thread):
"Chua probably believes that its her strictness and strong principles that are leading her children to excel. And these have their role, no doubt. But I would propose, following Harris, it is her oppressive control of their social lives which is the much stronger factor."
- phd514 9y agoThat seems to be an example of "parent is important factor in child's development though not in the way the parent intended" rather than "parent is not important factor in child's development".