4 ms·
You're probably right that it's paranoia, but I just don't see any promises from Google to shield from or take responsibility for infringement; they just sugges
by detst 16y ago
You're probably right that it's paranoia, but I just don't see any promises from Google to shield from or take responsibility for infringement; they just suggest that they could license patents in the future.
It probably wouldn't stop me but I would only do so without any sort of expectations from Google.
- nitrogen 16y agoNone of the major codec players promise to shield from or take responsibility for infringement, at least not for normal licenses. Not MPEG-LA, not Microsoft, not IEEE, not Google, not Fraunhofer.
- detst 16y agoRight, but he said: I believe the libvpx license does shield you from patent claims (meaning google will take responsibility in case of any infringement).
- nitrogen 16y agoYes, I was just trying to clarify that situation for any other readers who may be surprised by the lack of indemnification.