3 ms·
> The author of this article cites "more ReactJS libraries on npm" to imply that React is the better choice. Some people love a la carte infrastructure and the
by albedoa 9y ago
> The author of this article cites "more ReactJS libraries on npm" to imply that React is the better choice. Some people love a la carte infrastructure and the power that comes from choosing each element in your stack.
Come on, that is not an honest reading. The author uses those numbers to demonstrate the health and maturity of the respective ecosystems. The power of choice is a bonus for those who choose to leverage it.
- emodendroket 9y agoI don't think you're getting the point being made here. More choice also means more headaches like "do these two things work together?" which is not a problem in angular-land where you need very few dependencies that are not part of the core application.
- albedoa 9y agoNo, you don't understand. The GP said the author cited those numbers for that reason, but the author did not.