3 ms·
I wonder if it's maybe the architecture of my application that means I don't need to store much state, and I only store state that doesn't seem to subject my ap
by forgottenacc57 9y ago
I wonder if it's maybe the architecture of my application that means I don't need to store much state, and I only store state that doesn't seem to subject my app to the issues you describe.
When I hear about these apps with a heavy reliance on client side state I wonder what the heck they are doing... if you've got so much complex data/logic does it really belong in client state? I'd see it as a problem and try to architect it out, or store it somewhere.
- lhnz 9y agoIt's absolutely possible to do something that has the issues I'm describing and never see any bugs because you are disciplined and careful. However, as a contractor, I have worked with plenty of teams where due to horrible deadlines and sloppy practices all of the problems I've described have occurred. Basically: once you climb over the learning curve, Redux helps you here.