2 ms·
It's really entertaining and worth reading, but it's still intentionally biased to almost suggest "a little bit of radiation can be good for you" in a way that
by acqq 9y ago
It's really entertaining and worth reading, but it's still intentionally biased to almost suggest "a little bit of radiation can be good for you" in a way that smoking was presented in older times by the tobacco companies.
And it's not so. An individual can be lucky, but it's not something to be approached with "don't worry". The proofs are in Eileen Welsome's "The Plutonium Files: America's Secret Medical Experiments in the Cold War"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Plutonium_Files https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Plutonium_Files
Much more depressing than Mahaffey's book.
And example of the attitude of these responsible, Welsome, speaking in 1999:
https://www.c-span.org/video/?153507-1/plutonium-files https://www.c-span.org/video/?153507-1/plutonium-files
"Los Alamos National Laboratory told me they knew nothing about the experiment and in fact denied that it occurred even though it was a subject of the congressional report in 1986."