4 ms·
No. In theory, that new gas plant is "planned" and replacing aging capacity, while meeting expected demand. Rates are separate. Many power utilities are gran
by caminante 9y ago
No. In theory, that new gas plant is "planned" and replacing aging capacity, while meeting expected demand.
Rates are separate.
Many power utilities are granted a monopoly, especially the transmission (high voltage, long distance) and distribution ("last mile" / neighborhood wires) horizontals as they're true natural monopolies.
In exchange for that concession, their profits are capped. The cap is a function of their "rate base" -- i.e. qualifying capex -- and an approved rate. These rates are adjusted periodically, requiring public utility commission (State) or FERC (federal) rate setting sessions.
For example, "Total Revenue Requirement = Rate Base [assets] × Allowed Rate of Return + Expenses" [0]
Without having looked into this, it's easy to over-estimate how easy (hard) life as a public utility is.
[0] http://blog.aee.net/how-do-electric-utilities-make-money http://blog.aee.net/how-do-electric-utilities-make-money
- spangry 9y agoThis kind of regulatory response to natural monopolies can (and does) result in 'gold-plating'. It incentivises profit-maximising monopolists to over-invest in qualifying capital: even though their ROI remains the same, their absolute profit grows larger. However, there's no easy solution here: natural monopolies are a genuinely tricky public policy issue. Alternative solutions that come to mind are more direct price controls or public ownership. I'm not suggesting these are superior alternatives; just throwing them in there to provide more grist for the conversational mill.
- DrScump 9y agoCalifornia is an expert at this. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_electricity_crisis https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_electricity_crisis