OK, maybe it sets a Canadian precedent limiting what can be ordered from Google in such cases, but it sets a nasty (informal) international precedent of random

OK, maybe it sets a Canadian precedent limiting what can be ordered from Google in such cases, but it sets a nasty (informal) international precedent of random country X strong-arming a company from country Y to censor content in country Z. That's why Google opposed this motion and that's what many others, including me, have an issue with. I don't live in Canada, don't do business with Canada and don't want to give a rat's ass about Canadian courts and their rulings.