I dunno, generally the best argument for democracy is when things come out of balance, there is a mechanism to adjust how things work without violent revolution

I dunno, generally the best argument for democracy is when things come out of balance, there is a mechanism to adjust how things work without violent revolution (which generally necessitates a greater level of destruction than is advisable). Since the general impression of Hong Kong democracy is "yeah, we'll let you vote, but the party is going to have the last word" it's hard to imagine a scenario whereby the status quo (i.e. current elites) will ever be allowed to be threatened. Well, until it's too late, and the torches and pitchforks come out. Am I wrong?