Your tone is gratuitously negative. The article's central point doesn't "revolve around the distribution of power capacity and generation." It's more precise.

Your tone is gratuitously negative. The article's central point doesn't "revolve around the distribution of power capacity and generation." It's more precise. Specifically, it's highlighting the current state of CA renewables policy (with a specific knock on effect for emphasis) and the missing money problem. I found the article insightful and accurate.