3 ms·
I agree that other drugs are definitely harder to obtain, however I still believe that the people who would try and use harder drugs would remain the same. I j
by jpdbaugh 16y ago
I agree that other drugs are definitely harder to obtain, however I still believe that the people who would try and use harder drugs would remain the same. I just don't think the demand is that high for hard drugs such as LSD, cocaine, heroine, etc would increase with additional supply. Its just not that common for people to want to to them. Therefore, if they were legal there just wouldn't be that much of a market for those drugs and again there wouldn't be any noticeable difference in the day to day to the non-user.
- philwelch 16y agoLSD isn't a "hard drug" in the slightest. But more importantly, cocaine and heroin don't have constricted supply--you can get plenty of both. I don't think there's enough LSD to satisfy demand at the moment, especially not with authenticity concerns.
- jpdbaugh 16y agoYou are right I shouldn't have lumped LSD in with Cocaine and Heroine. I have heard before that LSD doesn't even have any real side affects. Is that true?
- GFischer 16y agoI got interested in that, the most authoritative source I could find on the fly (the NIH) seems to say it might cause flashbacks, but "LSD is not considered an addictive drug since it does not produce compulsive drug-seeking behavior.": http://www.nida.nih.gov/infofacts/hallucinogens.html http://www.nida.nih.gov/infofacts/hallucinogens.html