3 ms·

Part of the reason DQ was "well received" initially was because at face value it appears as though it's for a cause. Plus, (as mentioned by Gamergate) there's a

Part of the reason DQ was "well received" initially was because at face value it appears as though it's for a cause. Plus, (as mentioned by Gamergate) there's an unwritten rule about criticizing anything even remotely appearing "progressive." It's not hard to find overwhelming posts pointing these facts out: https://www.reddit.com/r/OutOfTheLoop/comments/2dw9hh/why_is_zoe_quinn_maker_of_depression_quest_so/ https://www.reddit.com/r/OutOfTheLoop/comments/2dw9hh/why_is... Any the cherry on top is your last line. "Suspect" Once again, either people are forced to cave in, or otherwise be "suspect" or "problematic" or "misogynist" or just the bad guy. Am I not allowed to point out the simple fact that DQ has no scientific educational value and as such does not belong on that list? If so, why am I not allowed to state this simple truth? Because it's inconvenient?

the_af 9y ago
> Am I not allowed to point out the simple fact that DQ has no scientific educational value You have, and the person who put DQ in the list disagreed. Why does it matter whether you personally like the game? You said your thing, the other person disagreed. Unless you're emotionally invested in DQ in particular, for unrelated reasons, I'd say the case is closed.