3 ms·

Wouldn't it be simpler to use VirtualHost so you only respond with content to requests for your domain? Then set it up so requests without the domain name get

by jauer 16y ago

Wouldn't it be simpler to use VirtualHost so you only respond with content to requests for your domain? Then set it up so requests without the domain name get a 301 redirect to the canonical URL.

blantonl 16y ago
on Apache, SSL and VirtualHost don't play together.
- dhess 16y ago
  They do with Apache 2.2.12 or later and any recent browser: http://wiki.apache.org/httpd/NameBasedSSLVHostsWithSNI http://wiki.apache.org/httpd/NameBasedSSLVHostsWithSNI http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Server_Name_Indication http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Server_Name_Indication I'm using SNI on all of my domains, and it works great.