2 ms·
> Obviously attribution becomes far more important with cyberattacks, but that's a tangential point. No its not, its the whole point. The point of the age of i
by Quarrelsome 9y ago
> Obviously attribution becomes far more important with cyberattacks, but that's a tangential point.
No its not, its the whole point. The point of the age of information is that it is a departure from the age of blood and steel. The tactics of blood and steel that you are supporting have no place in this future and are counter-productive.
The point of the age of information is that power is no longer solely in the hands of nations. Therefore treating it as a case of "stomping on the bad people" means your attack spread increases from all the nations in the world to all the people in the world. Added to that the evidence of those attacks can and will be forged.
You're chasing shadows and its not worth it. Just build a better shield, that's all that matters.
- floatboth 9y agoYes. This. Old government people think of everything in terms of "weapons" and "wars" and they still think the word "cyber" is cool. We need to promote, like, a radical new school of thought about software: Creators of a system should be fully responsible for whatever damage the system causes. A bug is a bug, whether it's exploited by an outside actor or it happens during normal execution. Developers should be responsible for bugs. I like the "defective lock" analogy from https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14663474 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14663474