3 ms·
The LE protocol is fully open and even specified in RFCs - I wonder if any paid cert providers will ever move to that type of painless automated renewal (plus a
by nneonneo 9y ago
The LE protocol is fully open and even specified in RFCs - I wonder if any paid cert providers will ever move to that type of painless automated renewal (plus automated billing, of course). This would allow folks to potentially get their "advanced" certs (EV, wildcard, crossdomain, etc.) renewed without the rigmarole that you mention (although some cert categories come with their own non-automatable processes).
Right now, I have LE certs for my main website and for a test webserver hosted on my laptop, both renewed automatically and painlessly through cron jobs. The fire and forget nature of LE is very convenient.
- dom0 9y agoEV certificates are not allowed to be renewed automatically AFAIK.
- frutiger 9y agoThat's not a part of the ACME protocol (which is what Let's Encrypt implements), it's a policy decision of Let's Encrypt. Grandparent's comment is about other CAs offering EV certs over ACME.
- dom0 9y ago??? EV guidelines have nothing to do with Let's Encrypt or ACME. They state that even for renewal all checks have to be done again, which cannot be automated.
- Klathmon 9y agoMaybe not fully automated, but at least the provider could "start" the process, only requiring the company they are validating to answer some questions, reply to mail, reply to whatever kind of extra authentication/verification is needed, then the technical portion can happen automatically after that.
- tialaramex 9y agoThe situation is that facts about the Subject recorded in a certificate must be Validated. For the Domain Name Validation (which is the main thing web browsers and several other kinds of software care about) this is done by one of the 10 Blessed Methods. ACME automates three of those ten methods. Some others can't be automated (e.g. get a bona fide lawyer to sign a physical paper document saying they've checked you really own the DNS name) EV requires also validating the Subject entity's name and place of business. This cannot be entirely automated today. But some CA issuers specialising in EV get very close, like an hour turnaround in most cases for businesses in places where they operate. The intent in ACME is that semi-automated processes would be handled to one side of ACME, you'd do them offline, and you'd gain "authz" which are how ACME tracks validation, for the things which had been validated offline. Also, it's not necessary to re-validate everything for every new issuance. Suppose you prove you're really EXA Metal Pole Location Executives, business #123123123 of Some City, Texas. A CA would be entitled to rely on having validated that for some time, I think it's currently up to three years. In that time you could issue and re-issue hundreds, even thousands of certificates with no extra fuss.
- tialaramex 9y agoYes, several CAs have indicated that they are at the least watching the ACME development, and it was intended from the outset that ACME would have other users beyond Let's Encrypt. Also keep in mind that if you're a big customer the big CAs already had products where things are streamlined for you, so the annoying experience you get as a small operator is not necessarily happening at scale for a large corporation like, say, Disney.