3 ms·
Wow. How can anyone be confused about this? This is clear cut. The stackexchange answers are correct and this HN thread is filled with really unethical, almost
by kyberias 9y ago
Wow. How can anyone be confused about this? This is clear cut. The stackexchange answers are correct and this HN thread is filled with really unethical, almost childish advice. What the guy is doing is basically fraud. The employer expects him to do efficient work. If he can automate it, that automation is owned by his employer.
- aykutcan 9y agoHe is doing efficient work. It is so much efficient than working by hand. Why automation will be owned by his employer ? Just why ?
- triangleman 9y agoThey hired a "computer guy" for "data entry". The computer guy develops a system to facilitate data entry, which is exactly what he was hired to do. It's not like he developed a cool iPhone game in his spare time, unrelated to his job. The work was directly job related.
- kyberias 9y agoYes, and as you said, the work was directly job related, he developed a tool to make his work more efficient. Then he didn't tell about the tool to his employer. Obviously he should have. They pay for his time. He should have disclosed that he can now perform the work much faster so that they can use his time for other stuff. Why is this so hard to accept?