3 ms·
>would have numbers on the scaling improvement column on the scaling efforts list. "3-10x" for ditching EVM for WASM which is at a concept phase, "2-8x" for par
by Jabanga 9y ago
>would have numbers on the scaling improvement column on the scaling efforts list. "3-10x" for ditching EVM for WASM which is at a concept phase, "2-8x" for parallel processing of transactions
Isn't allowing for more variance more honest?
- kbody 9y agoOne issue is that not even the devs[1] working on these challenges dare to make claims like "2x scaling". Because it's a ridiculous statement since "scaling" is not just TPS and it's a more complicated topic. The developers are still on design phase, they never said anything about #x'ing the TPS or anything. It's really unfortunate that Ehrsam made such a horrible post. I'd rather have Vitalik or Vlad making a State of Scaling blog post than this propaganda to circulate among newcomers so they can support the price. [1]: https://github.com/ewasm/design https://github.com/ewasm/design
- Jabanga 9y agoThe claim is not 2X, it's "2-8X", which is a far larger margin for error, and in my eyes, totally reasonable for a bird's eye analysis of Ethereum's scalability prospects.