4 ms·

Thanks for the reference ,but I read your earlier comment here's the issue when picking reactjs vs others (like vuejs) Choice A. by picking reactjs I'm in a c

by bedros 9y ago

Thanks for the reference ,but I read your earlier comment here's the issue when picking reactjs vs others (like vuejs) Choice A. by picking reactjs I'm in a clear violation of FB patents, but I'm covered as long I don't sue FB. Choice B. by picking others (like vuejs), I may or may not be violating FB patents, (virtualDOM has some prior art, as some people claim) why it's so hard for people to understand that "May or Maynot" is a better choice of "definitely" violating FB patents in case I need to sue FB if they are killing my business by copying my patents. I know that suing for patents is not best business model. But, having that weapon (even defensively) is better than not having one. still people downvote for gray areas?

vonmoltke 9y ago
You're being down voted because this core bit of your position is a load of crap: > Choice A. by picking reactjs I'm in a clear violation of FB patents Please tell us what Facebook patents one is "violating" by using React.
- bedros 9y ago
  all tech companies file patents to protect their cutting edge technology, so it's common sense FB has patents on react. your argument of where are the FB patents on react is an example of your naivety my position all along has been, using other libs than react is LESS likely to violate FB patents, and thus gives more freedom to compete with FB. if that's your definition of load-of-crap, well, that's not my definition.