It is not the previous, original decision that affects Canada only that I am concerned about. It's the global reach here. Some of their wording about Google ina

It is not the previous, original decision that affects Canada only that I am concerned about. It's the global reach here. Some of their wording about Google inadvertently assisting the non-Canadian company outside Canada strike me as not understanding how the web works. I concur with the dissenters that mentioned the issue should be taken up with the other company's government (France?). It just reeks of protectionism, applied outside the country's jurisdiction because they have the leverage to do so. > That's why the Apple v. Samsung cases are so high-stakes. It would be like the US court told Samsung they couldn't violate Apple's US patents on phones sold in Mexico.