3 ms·
That's all good and well, but what about when national laws conflict? Which they do, all the time.
by lawly 9y ago
That's all good and well, but what about when national laws conflict? Which they do, all the time.
- ocdtrekkie 9y agoI would argue that in that case, it's up to the international corporation to decide which country they'd rather do business in.
- lawly 9y agoSo your solution is to have no international business? Brilliant!
- ocdtrekkie 9y agoA lot of people would be better off. Few to no international companies could be found totally innocent of tax dodging schemes and the like. But rather, my point is: If a company wants to do business in multiple countries, they are going to have to obey multiple countries laws. Nobody's required to do business globally, and no country is required to enable it. And if the threat of losing access to Google search is such a risk that a country would need to capitulate to a corporation's demands, it would only be more evidence for the need to bust that monopoly up.