5 ms·
for those who downvoted me, can you explain why I'm wrong, Would you believe that Apple today would use react in their products? What would Steve Jobs say to
by bedros 9y ago
for those who downvoted me, can you explain why I'm wrong,
Would you believe that Apple today would use react in their products?
What would Steve Jobs say to someone who suggests using react in apple software/saas?
downvoting on HN is being abused here, just because someone is a big fan of reactjs and disagrees with me, they automatically downvote a valid opinion based on facts.
see for yourself, from react patent clause
"The license granted hereunder will terminate, automatically and without notice,"
https://github.com/facebook/react/blob/master/PATENTS https://github.com/facebook/react/blob/master/PATENTS
- spicyj 9y agoYes, Apple is known to use React. If you are in doubt, the license that could terminate is just the patent grant. The copyright license would remain in effect.
- chc 9y agoI explained how you're wrong here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14659675 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14659675 The TL;DR is: "That is just a patent license, and most OSS doesn't even include a patent license at all, so it seems weird to be super-concerned in this case in particular."
- bedros 9y agoThanks for the reference ,but I read your earlier comment here's the issue when picking reactjs vs others (like vuejs) Choice A. by picking reactjs I'm in a clear violation of FB patents, but I'm covered as long I don't sue FB. Choice B. by picking others (like vuejs), I may or may not be violating FB patents, (virtualDOM has some prior art, as some people claim) why it's so hard for people to understand that "May or Maynot" is a better choice of "definitely" violating FB patents in case I need to sue FB if they are killing my business by copying my patents. I know that suing for patents is not best business model. But, having that weapon (even defensively) is better than not having one. still people downvote for gray areas?
- vonmoltke 9y agoYou're being down voted because this core bit of your position is a load of crap: > Choice A. by picking reactjs I'm in a clear violation of FB patents Please tell us what Facebook patents one is "violating" by using React.
- bedros 9y agoall tech companies file patents to protect their cutting edge technology, so it's common sense FB has patents on react. your argument of where are the FB patents on react is an example of your naivety my position all along has been, using other libs than react is LESS likely to violate FB patents, and thus gives more freedom to compete with FB. if that's your definition of load-of-crap, well, that's not my definition.