3 ms·
Is the latter dangerous because it is dissent? It sounds like we are now defining a framework for what dissent is acceptable and it seems to align to a dominant
by iratewizard 9y ago
Is the latter dangerous because it is dissent? It sounds like we are now defining a framework for what dissent is acceptable and it seems to align to a dominant political ideology. Sort of defeats the point of dissent.
- SomeStupidPoint 9y agoCensorship is always a framework for defining acceptable dissent (or deviance, if you prefer).
- Zak 9y agoIt's dangerous because it evokes a specific fear that's likely to inspire action. You could swap migrants and Irish in an area with a sufficient Irish population and it would still be true. > the migrants suck Is pretty harmless, while > Keep the horny Irish teenagers away from our daughters might well lead to someone assaulting people they perceived to be Irish teenagers who were getting too friendly with their daughters.