3 ms·
Actually, at $100k/yr per team member even Mozilla could afford such a team several times over. At least one if several of them of talent level nostrademons des
by nickpsecurity 9y ago
Actually, at $100k/yr per team member even Mozilla could afford such a team several times over. At least one if several of them of talent level nostrademons described were made ridiculous-good offers. :)
It appears it was management and/or politics that stopped other companies from doing what Google did.
- saghm 9y ago$100k/yr is around what an entry level software engineer gets at Google. I'd guess that Google paid these experts much more than that.
- nickpsecurity 9y agoYeah, probably.
- ido 9y agoAnd salary cost is usually about 30% above the gross salary. They probably cost google >$250k each.
- nickpsecurity 9y agoMozilla had around $7-8 million in profit last I looked. Currently over $9 million. They could still afford them at $250k each. Such a project would've even been worth most or all of a year's profit. Fortunately, they're doing Quantum to improve things. :)
- tsunamifury 9y ago500k to 1 million per person mininmum.
- nostrademons 9y agoRevenue is the important number to look at - Wikipedia has it at $329.5M as of 2014. Profit is after salaries - when all the early Firefox people left, they were replaced by other programmers, who probably cost a bit less but not a whole lot. I think tsunamifury's estimate of $500K-1M minimum isn't out of line, but even then, a team of 20 people making $1M fully-loaded costs $20M, which isn't exorbitant. Mozilla's revenue was estimated at $57M in 2006.
- nickpsecurity 9y agoGotcha. I wasnt using revenue since I didnt know enough about their expenses. Appreciate you filling in some blanks.