>From my perspective, both browsers have a bar at the top to enter a URL ... Not sure what else (other than configuration menus, perhaps?) That's where the dif

>From my perspective, both browsers have a bar at the top to enter a URL ... Not sure what else (other than configuration menus, perhaps?) That's where the difference exactly lies. Firefox feels like it is designed by a programmer, Chrome feels like it was planned by a UX person then built by the programmer. 1. There's still a search bar alongside the omnibox. Unnecessary. 2. History is an important part which firefox allocates a measly sidebar. Chrome offers the whole page although with less powerful options to navigate compared to firefox (by time, by site, etc). 3. Bookmarking experience is a lot more thought out in Chrome. When I bookmark something, Firefox just puts the bookmark in Other bookmarks but Chrome remembers the last folder you used. I really can't come up all the cases where Firefox frustrates me but Chrome doesn't, but that according to me is a sign of good design. Chrome has a lot less friction and minimal cognitive overload. Sure, Firefox has many features I would love to have in chrome, but I know that Chrome will present those options with a much smoother experience.