3 ms·
In the old days there were the journals from the scientific societies and the Elsevier-Pergamon duopoly. Society journals were respectable, generally speaking,
by HarryHirsch 9y ago
In the old days there were the journals from the scientific societies and the Elsevier-Pergamon duopoly. Society journals were respectable, generally speaking, and subscriptions were affordable. Elsevier/Pergamon was expensive, pretty bad, and something you could do without if you had to. If the library wouldn't subscribe you'd ask for a reprint. Things weren't great 30 years ago but manageable.
Several things have happened since. The society journals have mostly been sold to commercial publishers, and prices have gone up steeply, Elsevier is as sketchy as always but even more expensive, and the various open-access journals have popped up, with a quality even worse than Elsevier. Finally, even academics at teaching institutions are forced to publish thanks to clueless administrators and a general shortage of funds.
Scientific publishing is fully out of control. Librarians thought they had it bad in 2001, but look at it now!
- FabHK 9y agoSorry, I really meant to refrain from it, but having read the article, I'm again forced to say: Ceterum censeo Elsevier esse delendum. (Could be Elsevierum, depending which declension - it's an accusativus cum infinitivo)