3 ms·
>> No. He is working remotely and the employer is paying for getting the job done. To me, the test of whether he is being paid for results or time is whether h
by slantyyz 9y ago
>> No. He is working remotely and the employer is paying for getting the job done.
To me, the test of whether he is being paid for results or time is whether he is paid more if the work required more than the 40 hours.
- arthurjj 9y agoAgreed. Assuming he's salaried and not hourly there's no argument in my mind that he should feel required to tell them. If he's hourly I'd say it might be a gray area.
- davidw 9y ago> If he's hourly I'd say it might be a gray area If you're on contract to work X hours and you're doing 20% of that, it's a "gray area"?
- slantyyz 9y agoThat really depends. I've seen a lot of contract engagements where part of "the work" is just being there (or available) during standard business hours (e.g., 40h) regardless of whether you're doing anything. So depending on the situation, it is a "gray area".