> Are you familiar with Cui bono? Of course. It's a very good heuristic for where to start an investigation; the guilty party is often found among the people t

> Are you familiar with Cui bono? Of course. It's a very good heuristic for where to start an investigation; the guilty party is often found among the people that benefit. It can also be a plausible motive. However, as evidence it's only circummstanti8al. I shouldn't accuse you of robbing your local bank simply because you could have benefited from the stolen cash. > are generally accepted as Russia's doing despite any concrete evidence A lot of people have been making fallacious claims about Russia (and other places). I suspect that Putin is responsible for some of tho9se claims, but that doesn't mean they all are. Argumentum ad populum is still a fallacy,