Protecting groups? This is really backwards. Does it matter who i want to kill ? It's ok to say kill all the children, but not OK to say man shouldn't be invite

Protecting groups? This is really backwards. Does it matter who i want to kill ? It's ok to say kill all the children, but not OK to say man shouldn't be invited to a women-only party? Excluding a politician just because he's politician? This is the result of what happens when you give the job to the wrong kind of people. It sounds like you've tried to let a mathematician do a philosopher's job. There should be clear red lines. You either suggest actual physical harm to a group or a person, or you don't. Which group is irrelevant. Anything else, as long as no harm will be done to a person, I don't care how offensive you find something. If you don't want to read it move along to the next page please. If people want black segregation or to deny the holocaust (I'm jewish and most people here see this as a huge red line) - let them. These discussions will happen, within facebook or ourside it, these opinions will be shared. Let them say it, and let the people who disagree state their opinion and try to convince. Stop the bubble, stop the misconception that arguing is bad, if you really care about something, stop trying to shut mouths and start working hard on convincing people. When was the last time telling someone to shut up ever changed something for good. And if you actually let people argue anonymously it'd be much better.