4 ms·
Because it shows willful deception. In a court of law, this would likely be a significant point in the case.
by jsjohnst 9y ago
Because it shows willful deception. In a court of law, this would likely be a significant point in the case.
- icebraining 9y agoWhat law would he be breaking?
- williamscales 9y agoProbably either fraud or breach of contract if it came to a court
- true_religion 9y agoDepends on if the errors are material to the value produced. Like let's say I produce a report in an automatic way but have all the page number misaligned and occasionally insert incorrect punctuation then that does reduce the value of the report.
- ocschwar 9y agoIt would be a tort.
- xxSparkleSxx 9y agoCould using printed fonts that look like hand-writing to advertise count as willful deception? You're trying to trick the consumer into thinking a human made the sign (and by extension the product as well), which was actually made my machines. I don't see a difference. When I buy a product, there is no disclosure of the manufacturing process. I could only see a good lawyer losing this case if OP signed a contract that explicitly stated the process in which his work must be produced.
- jsjohnst 9y agoIn your scenario, I don't see a correlation with the facts you presented vs the previous example. In the previous example, they provided evidence of a potential (IANAL or a judge or on a jury for the case, thus potential) crime, I merely stated that I believed the willful deception would likely be a significant point in the case. Without knowing the "case" in your example, I can't know if the font used would be significant or not.